Marie Antoinette (2006)

Marie AntoinetteI’m not sure if this is an overreach, but I feel like Sofia Coppola’s choice to make a biopic of sorts about Marie Antoinette is a feminist statement in of itself. That probably requires some justification, so here goes: what comes to mind when you hear ‘Marie Antoinette’? For me – and I imagine for many others – I think of that infamous quotation “Let them eat cake.”

Give or take the guillotine, that quote – historically dubious though it is, presented as a tabloid invention in Coppola’s film – is the main thing I remember about the French Revolution. For the most part, that quote resonates because it’s a perfect encapsulation of vain greed, a realisation of our worst fears of the disregard of the spoiled ruling class. But I’d argue there’s an edge of sexism beneath the scorn, centring the excess of French royalty in thoroughly feminine frivolity. (After all, who remembers Louis XVI? Other than people who actually care about history, duh.) Marie Antoinette operates as a scapegoat, a symbol bearing the brunt of scorn rather than the intensely inequitable society that produced her.

Marie Antoinette’s first challenge, then, is to act as a kind of courtship – or seduction. Just as teenage Marie (Kirsten Dunst) must win over her foppish, childish husband (Jason Schwartzman, expertly channelling an awkward, closeted twelve year-old), so too must Coppola win over her audience. Rather than initially trying to present Marie as a moral figure – a dubious ask – she presents as an oblivious innocent with an edge of eroticism. Again and again Marie is filmed in states of undress or in flimsy, transparent nightgowns; it’s occasionally sexy, yes (it helps that Dunst was God-tier attractive at 24 years old), but it’s also often infantilising, such as when Marie stands naked before of a gaggle of high class ladies waiting for the highest-ranked to clothe her.

Eventually and inevitably she establishes herself in France. She bears Louis’ children, and ascends to the rank of Queen after Louis XV’s (Rip Torn’s) death. No longer do we see Marie barely-clad; she is only dressed in the finest of gowns. There are so many gowns here, and ridiculous hair, and cake – of course, cake! It’s colourful and excessive and oh so very Sofia Coppola. I’ve seen this opulent aspect of the film dismissed as “a pop video” but that’s the point, dammit.

Marie AntoinetteMuch like Amadeus before it, Marie Antoinette consciously avoids historical accuracy in events or aesthetics, and even borrows Amadeus’ retro-pop-punk style (given that Tom Hardy briefly appears to play a celebrity head-style game as Mozart, I don’t think this is accidental). The post-punk soundtrack (it opens with Gang of Four’s “Natural’s Not in It”! I love you Sofia!) is a clever choice, recalling the early eighties and how that genre of music became the commercialised confection called “New Wave.” The parallels between the excesses of the French royalty of the eighteenth century and the American corporate culture of the eighties are obvious. But they’re given extra nuance by the screenplay’s suggestion that the cause of the poverty that led to the French Revolution is France’s support of America’s own revolution against the British.

All of these subtleties are buried under piles of glorious silk and sumptuous treats, of course, which means that it’s easy to characterise the film as pretty but purposeless. Just as with the myth of Marie Antoinette’s “Let them eat cake,” it’s worth digging deeper.

3.5 stars

7 thoughts on “Marie Antoinette (2006)

  1. Outstanding, Dave. You are the only one I’ve ever heard give such high praise for this film. Your feminist arguments make sense as does your analysis. Especially liked your connection between 80s New Wave confectionery music and the excessive attitudes of the French Aristocracy. I’d be interested in knowing how you felt about Duchess with Keira Knightly and Ralph Fiennes? I’ve been meaning to do a review of that film for ages and don’t know why I’m waiting.

    • I’ve never seen Duchess: to be honest, I’d dismissed it as a generic costume drama purely on the basis of its underwhelming poster. Worth seeing, I take it?

      • Well, there’s Ralph, so it can’t be that bad. There’s some great cinematic shots through beveled glass, for example. I don’t know if you like Keira Knightley or not; she seems to have a love/hate following. The costumes are superb. It felt like a Lady Diana spinoff–poor sweet thing that’s stuck in loveless marriage. Let’s see, what else would people dislike about it? I personally liked it a lot for the feminist angle–the lack of rights for females or choice in their own happiness, they were pawns, etc., etc., is a message today’s young lady cannot fathom, so for that reason alone it’s worth the viewing. Based on a true story, the drama, the melodrama is interesting. There’s a scene, for example, where a bastard child must be given up and I literally cried for Knightley’s character because I really felt it out there, the abandonment in the cold, moorish countryside. I fear I might be more sentimental than you and I love history, so it interests me, biopics. Who knows if you would like it, but I will say I liked it far more than disliked it.

  2. “The parallels between the excesses of the French royalty of the eighteenth century and the American corporate culture of the eighties are obvious.” What a brilliant observation. Outstanding review that reminded me I really have to see this film again!

  3. I’ve actually read the biography that inspired this film and you’ve hit the nail on the head with this review. Marie Antoinette was really dealt a complete shit sandwich and desperately did her best to cope turning herself into a totally misunderstood character, one that was blamed for so much that she knew nothing about. I definitely need to rewatch this.

    • I don’t actually know much of the details of her history, beyond what I can remember from high school. I’m not sure that this is particularly faithful to the details of her life, either! But it’s a good film nonetheless. Thanks for the comment!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s