Star Trek (2009)

Star Trek (2009)

JJ Abrams’ reinvention of Star Trek is best described as “good enough.” It’s good enough to earn enough money to prompt a sequel, Into Darkness. It’s good enough to balance the expectations of both avid Star Trek fans and those largely unfamiliar with the original series (though the fan service is a tad overdone). But it’s never really a great film in its own right. Star Trek is like a Big Mac: acceptable, consistent but nothing to get too excited about.

There are some great moments in the mix; the introduction really earns its histrionic emotion (thanks to a pre-stardom Chris Hemsworth) and the conceit – using time travel to reinterpret the backstory, the villain (Eric Bana, a rare disappointment) wielding formidable power thanks to technology from the future – is a clever way to construct the film.

Ultimately, it’s too uneven. It’s most successful when it adopts a jokey tone that’s at odds with a high stakes plot that revolves around the destruction of Vulcan and the near-destruction of Earth. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, in particular, shine when they’re exchanging banter but aren’t convincing in the more dramatic scenes. Star Trek tries to do too much and suffers for it.

Rating: 102/200

2 thoughts on “Star Trek (2009)

  1. Pingback: Canon Will Eat Itself: Alien and Other Modern Icons | ccpopculture

  2. Pingback: Star Trek Beyond Boldly Goes Where Sci-Fi Films Have Gone Before | ccpopculture

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s